Hunt

03/28/2010 - 22:19

 

These elders from the Troibriands (Kitava is part of this island chain) are clearly suffering from the effects of yam consumption. (more) Those carbs really catch up to you when you get old, especially since the islanders are only slightly more active than the average westerner. 

Whereas this raw reindeer eater is much superior on his diet of mostly meat. 

All in jest of course. Really, all of these men look healthy and certainly seem to have aged better than most Americans. I'm not against carnivory, but I personally don't see the need to restrict my diet to one that I find to be boring, expensive, and time-consuming when it doesn't seem like people eating unprocessed carbohydrates are exactly wreaked by them. 

In fact, given Western standards of lean beauty (which I would say are often totally unconnected to health and I personally don't expect to look like I do now once I am 60 and have had several children), the Islanders look much healthier and more attractive at any age, though there is probably more incentive to look great if you are going around without many clothes. I think a bad reaction to carbs is more a testament to a damaged metabolism, poor gut flora, or epigenetic problems than our evolutionary heritage. 

 

03/28/2010 - 13:59

 Something I've been thinking about lately are poverty foods. Paleolithic people did not usually engage in food storage, but with the advent of the neolithic, people starting keeping a larder that could help them survive. Cured, pickled, canned, confited, salted, highly spiced, and dried foods are legacies of this heritage. Some would argue that many hunting societies like the plains Indians or the Inuit also ate dried meat and that's true (though they knew they needed at least some fresh meat to prevent disease), but it's a good example of why hunter-gatherers are not models of the paleolithic. 

Many such foods are popular among paleo dieters from jerky to canned sardines. I wouldn't argue that all of these foods are bad, but I have had to eliminate many of them from my diet and if you are on a paleo diet and continue having problems, perhaps they are worth eliminating. Studies on them are mixed. The regions that rely on them in very high amounts like Koreans (who eat massive amounts of pickled/salty/spicy foods) and those who live in Assam in India (VERY spicy and hot foods) have high rates of GI cancers. Perhaps the dose makes the poison though. For example, spicy foods have also shown to be cancer fighters! That's confusing! 

Either way, I think fresh foods are always better and if you are in the process of healing you might want to try to eat only fresh to avoid things that sick people can be sensitive to like oxidized fats and histamines. I think emphasis on fresh foods is one reason that people often initially do well on raw diets. 

I eliminated spicy foods when I started paleo because of their association with heartburn, which I suffered from. I now eat spicy foods a few times a week and haven't had problems so far, perhaps because my stomach isn't so inflamed by other crap. But recently I fell in love with a heavily spiced tea and was drinking it daily. If I didn't know that spices could be a problem I might not have realized it was causing me trouble. 

03/27/2010 - 11:02

 Cordian looked at the food intake of studied hunter gatherers and concluded:

"Of the 229 hunter-gatherer societies listed in the Ethnographic Atlas, 58% (n = 133) obtained >=66% of their subsistence from animal foods in contrast with 4% (n = 8) of societies that obtain >=66% of their subsistence from gathered plant foods...For worldwide hunter-gatherers, the most plausible (values not exceeding the mean MRUS) percentages of total energy from the macronutrients would be 19–35% for protein, 22–40% for carbohydrate, and 28–58% for fat "

Paleolithic people clearly preferred animal foods as they represented the highest quality nutrition, but only those without the choice to eat plants survived on very low carb diets and the Inuit clearly prized berries when they were in season. 

I think a very low carb approach to paleo is as un-paleolithic as a vegan approach. Both can be done and technically fit the definition of paleo, but they are far from optimal. The funny thing as that the people I know on very low carb are often as dependent on supplements as vegans, which doesn't speak much to the suitability of their diet for humans. Although it probably doesn't help that they often don't really try to emulate the diet of successful human carnivores like the Inuit who certainly consumed more than just ground beef. They ate kelp, berries, and a wide variety of meats ranging from fish to polar bear. In fact, arctic foods like smelt and seal are very high potassium and would prevent cramping. 

 

Comment?: 16
03/26/2010 - 14:20

Whenever I see an online argument between animal rights vegans and apostates/omnivores, they animal rights vegans claim that it's possible for anyone to be healthy as a vegan. I definitely think it's possible for many people to do veganism and I know several vegans who look and feel fine after doing veganism for several decades. But I know just as many who suffered on a vegan diet no matter what they did.

For an animal rights vegan you just have to keep trying because meat is murder and it's just not acceptable to eat even if you are sick. Whenever you present the list of things that just aren't in a plant based diet they retort that you can easily supplement those things.

Nutritionism at its finest. I respect nutrition science, but it's really in its infancy. There is so much that isn't known. Real whole foods are complex and synergistic. I'm happy there are now supplements to help those who chose to be vegan, but I refuse to accept the notion that veganism is the optimal diet that works for everyone. Maybe in the future when we know everything about nutrition and can put it in a pill, but that's not now.

Things have gotten better for vegans, but that speaks much to the juvenile status of nutrition research. Two decades ago the only supplement that was a known need was b-12, now thanks to scientific research we now know that vegans should supplement DHA as well. Who knows what the next discovery is? (ironically, all these discoveries were made at least in part by animal testing). If you are a vegan now, who really knows what you aren't getting? I think the best strategy for vegans is to supplement everything that is found in meat and that is not found in plants or that is found in lesser quality/quantity. whether or not the research is yet ironclad.

But my own goal has never been to just feel fine. I wanted to heal my illness, which I did on paleo and which was miserable on veganism. As a humanist I also wanted a diet that made me feel really good as a human. I confess I never was a animal rightist, which I feel to be a anti-humanist philosophy. As a humanist, I will always pick humans, like my grandmother who is alive because of a pig valve, over animals. Technology might someday replace the need for animals, but that's not on the radar right now.

I also would like to have truly healthy children and I think the research on prenatal nutrition and veganism is very small, but already points to serious problems. I'm going to place my bets on millions of years of human evolution rather than the tip of the iceburg we know about nutrition.

The nutrient I would like to feature today is taurine. Vegans say that the human body does a good job of synthesizing it and indeed we are able to make it ourselves. But is everyone able to make it in the correct quantities? And is the average amount we can synthesize enough? I would say definitely no on the first count and perhaps no on the second.

What is taurine? This article has a great summary. Taurine is an amino acid which is actually the most abundent intracellular amino acid in the human body. It is involved in many important and varied roles in the body from the metabolism to the blood to skeletal muscles to the heart. Here are a few:

  • Taurine promotes the flow and production of bile, which is the fluid produced in the liver that is essential for digesting fats. It prevents the condition known as cholestasis where the bile flow is blocked.
  • Taurine comprises 50% of the amino acids in the heart. It is important for maintaining proper blood pressure and rhythm.
  • Taurine is important for brain development and neurotransmission. Recent research has shown low levels in people with seizures.
  • Taurine is important in the eye's retina. People and animals with deficiencies often display retinal degeneration and lesions.
  • Taurine modulates insulin activity and the metabolism of fat and glucose. Preliminary research hints that high cholesterol might be caused by taurine deficiency that reduces synthesis of cholesterol into bile acids.
  • Taurine also shows activity as an antioxidant and early research shows it might play a role in male infertility, psoriasis, and depression. It has been shown to help heal colon cells and ulcers in animals.

Some scientists consider its consuming essential, other do not since healthy adults seem to be able to make it.

The average daily synthesis in adults ranges between 0.4-1.0 mmol (50-125 mg)1; under stress the synthesis capacity may be impaired; therewith some authors consider taurine as a conditionally essential amino acid, whereas for others it remains nonessential

Interestingly women synthesize it less efficiently and have higher incidences of conditions that may be caused by taurine deficiency like gallstones.

 

Taurine seems to be especially important for developing fetuses and infants

In the embryo, taurine deficiency has been associated with various lesions, e.g. cardiomyopathy, retinal degeneration and growth retardation. Taurine is probably an essential amino acid for neonates; due to enzymatic immaturity they have a limited capacity for its synthesis, and due to the immature kidney there is a relative inability to conserve taurine.

 

Other people who are probably not able to synthesize it include those with kidney and liver diseases and dysfunctions. It's not conditional for these people, it's essential. More research needs to be done on the effect of other illnesses on taurine synthesis.

What about healthy adults? This interesting study shows that even they might be affected by low taurine levels. Apparently vegetarians often have some "platelet hyperaggregability" which is a risk factor in thrombosis (dangerous blood clots), episodic vertigo, dizziness, and sudden deafness. This make sense, as platelets are rich in taurine. The authors say "Taurine is just one of a number of nutrients found almost solely in animal products – “carninutrients” – which are rational candidates for supplementation in vegans." Studies on vegans show that their taurine levels are much lower (earlier studies showed normal levels, but they made lab mistakes that messed up the data as explained here, which invalidates this study on taurine metabolism during reproduction), but I wonder if many omnivores are also too low on taurine as well.

The best sources are dark meats, with higher levels in raw meats, and seafoods like mussels and clams. Many omnivores don't eat these things. Growing up, I certainly didn't. Personally, I think it's an extreme stretch to give rights to mussels, so if you object to meat, why not eat those? Even Peter Singer admits that eating things like scallops might be OK.

Supplementation of taurine might be advisable, but there is some evidence that the supplement can exacerbate Psoriasis whereas the ingestion of taurine rich foods like turkey has not been shown to cause this problem. It shows the weakness in studies that just use isolated nutrients and also points to the fact that while suppplements can help people who want to do sub-optimal diets, there ain't nothing like the real thing...yet.

Addendum: Here is an interesting study that shows idiotic bias towards veganism. The summary reports vegan breast milk has similar (but still lower) levels of mean taurine as omnivore milk. But if you download the whole article you get a different picture. First of all, it seems they make a pretty idiotic mistake in their charts and I'm surprised it got published- the chart for breast milk claims to be in nmol/l contrasting with other papers that use nmol/ml. It makes their values basically nonsensical. Either way, the omnivore mean is 427. The vegan mean? 227, which is a statistically significant difference. Wanna bet the authors of this paper are vegan? The problem with vegan studies is there aren't many done, there aren't big populations of vegans, and the papers and studies done tend to be authored by vegans. Another major problem is that some scientists don't recognize that things like ADHD and crooked teeth are possible caused by poor prenatal or early childhood nutrition, but as science bolsters this connection perhaps we will see more interesting studies. 

Another thing to think about is what the omnivore women were eating. If they were eating a standard American diet perhaps they were taurine deficient compared to women eating real foods. In this other paper, Relationship between fatty acid compositions and taurine concentration in breast milk from Chinese rural mothers, it states that breast milk concentrations of taurine in Swedish and Ethiopian mothers was 761 and 667 respectively. The Chinese rural mothers had levels lower than the vegans in that study. The same was found in rural Mexican women.

I would venture to predict that if there ever were second or third generation vegans, their breast milk would have much lower levels. There is strong evidence for transgenerational effects of taurine deficiency, which also points to the fact that vegans aren't the only ones who should be thinking of taurine.

03/24/2010 - 21:25

It's not easy finding good chicken. In America, chicken has become almost like tofu in its blandness. It's a boring food for picky eaters who want something both low in fat and flavor. It doesn't have to be this way. A good chicken has its own flavor and holds up favorably to a good steak in deliciousness.

While poultry isn't my favorite meat, is is affordable´and relatively easy to cook well. I've bought several types of chickens this year and plan to buy more in the interests of um...research? Yes, if you are buying truly different types of breeds and production styles, the taste difference can be quite dramatic. 

A good example is the cult Bo Bo chicken. I know...what the heck is a Bo Bo? It's merely a brand of premium chickens primarily raised for the traditional Chinese market. There is a stigma that meat in ethnic food is poor quality and perhaps that is true. This NYTimes article on Bo Bo notes that some Chinese restaurants reserve the high quality dark meat for Chinese customers and leave the low quality frozen white junk for other customers. Kind of bad, but also kind of hilarious. I remember when I, like most Americans, thought the white meat was the "good" meat. It's only good if you are adverse to flavor and fat, which I admit I was. 

I picked up a cornish cross Bo Bo chicken at the Park Slope Co-op. Next time I'll definitely pick up their more unusual breeds, but they are much more expensive. The chickens sold at the PSFC are headless, but when Bo Bo is selling to the Chinese market they leave the heads on, as it is preferred by Chinese Buddhists to have an intact animal for prayer and to gauge the quality. Another thing they sell is stew hens. It seems like a waste of meat, but a stew hen goes intact into the stock pot. It's not a waste since the broth becomes potently flavorful and nutritious. Stew hens are typically last season's egg layers (yes vegetarians, your eggs = chicken death) and their flesh is too tough for eating. I suspect David Chang of Momofuku uses Bo Bo stew hens for his ramen broth since they are affordable and high quality. You can't get them at PSFC yet, but I think you might see them soon since stock making might be the next hipster food trend after canning has run its course. 

My headless chicken had a surprise though. Tucked instead the chest cavity were the chicken's impressively muscular feet. This chicken had definitely been running around. My boyfriend was helping me and was at first shocked by how large and ugly the feet were. I was delighted. They went in the stock pot with some other chicken bones, shallots, garlic, kombu, carrots, peppercorns, and some bacon ends. The resulting stock jelled perfectly, which is a marker of high quality stock. Also present was the liver. I made a paste by heating creamed coconut and mixing into it some crushed ginger, chopped cilantro, jalapeno, and red pepper curry paste (no PUFAS, just lemongrass, garlic, hot red pepper, etc.). I sauteed the liver in that and then added lime juice. It was a fairly tasty snack. Sadly, the heart was absent and I was confused with the packet of something pink that was in the chest cavity...no idea what it was at all. 

The legs and thighs of the chicken were absolutely delicious! They were full of a rich meaty flavor and just needed some salt and pepper. The wings though were a little gamey and I just don't like breast anymore, though I don't have the heart to simply throw it in the stock pot. 

I'm curious to try their black chicken next...or maybe their guinea hen...there are so many types of chicken to try, it's a good thing most are delicious! 

03/22/2010 - 12:11

The first NYC paleo skillshare was a BLAST! Over twenty people gathered at the Sanocki bro's awesome apartment at Union Square to discuss, learn, and most importantly- EAT!

Bone Stock

We learned about how to make a basic and tasty bone stock. Why bother with bones? Bones stocks are a great source of calcium, which can be hard to get on the paleo diet, as well as other vital nutrients. They are also simple to make and easy to digest, which is perfect if you are recovering from illnesses like leaky gut. For the foodies out there, bone stock is an essential part of every great chef's kitchen, providing the savory "umani" flavor in everything from silky mashed root vegetables to delicious soups.

Supplementary reading:

Why Broth is Beautiful by the Weston A. Price Foundation is a great article that further elucidates the healing properties of a good broth

Bones by Jennifer McLagen is an excellent cookbook that instructs on how to make basic broths and provides great recipes to use broth and other meaty bones. My basic broth recipe is from this cookbook...but

I modified it because I like to do Asian recipes. Most of my modifications are inspired by the Momofuku cookbook by David Chang which is a great cookbook that showcases how a fine restaurant like Momofuku utilizes bones, as well as lard.

Basic Bone Stock

The Bones: I use all the bones that come through my kitchen. Chicken bones are many people's favorites and whenever I roast a chicken I save the skeleton to make a delicious chicken soup. Veal bones are probably the second most prized, being extremely savory and flavorful. But all bones are useful. The stock we made in class had bison and pork bones. Don't worry about leftover flesh or other things hanging on the bones- this enhances flavor! In fact, Momofuku, which has plenty of money for ingredients, uses whole chickens to make their ramen broth. Roasting the bones enhances their flavor through the maillard reaction, which is in simple terms responsible the delicious savory flavor in seared and roasted foods. Roasting is optional, but delicious.

Acid: Draw out the minerals in the bones more effectively by adding your favorite acidic ingredient. Lemon juice is a versatile favorite, vinegars are also delicious, and when I am making a Mexican or Asian-inspired soup I often use lime juice.

Vegetables: Vegetables add flavor and nutrition to a stock. Stock is the perfect use for the trimmings of vegetables that have flavor, but that aren't delicious on their own. The tops of leeks, herb stems, carrot tops, celeriac stems, and other kitchen "waste" are perfect ingredients in stocks, but don't be afraid to buy vegetables specifically to make stock with. Vegetables to avoid in stocks include members of the cruciferous family, like cabbage and broccoli, which have many bitter compounds. I would in general avoid anything that's very bitter like beet stems. Members of the allium family- onions, leeks, shallots, garlic, and scallions, are particularly prized in stock. Carrots and celery/celeriac tops add a delicious fresh flavor.

Flavor enhancers: Bits of smoked meat (Momofuku uses bacon), mushrooms, bay leaves and peppercorns are my favorites.

Iodine hack: Iodine is a nutrient essential for thyroid health. Most people get it in processed salty foods that have it as an additive to the salt, but on the paleo diet you won't be eating much of that. The additive form is also inferior to the natural form found in marine foods. To add iodine to your stock and enhance digestibility, pick up a seaweed called kombu and add a stick or two to your stock.

Our Stock

First, we cut up the leeks, scallions, shallots, and garlic, making them into a "bed" on the roasting pan. On this bed we placed some pork bones from Aberdeen Hill Farms, which I purchased at the Park Slope Co-op, and some bison bones bought at Union Square Farmers Market. We roasted this at 435 F for an hour, then placed it in a large stock pot with our dried mushrooms, kombu I bought from The New Amsterdam Market, pepper, some parsley stems, and fresh squeezed lemon juice. We covered this with water and brought it to a boil. After that, we turned it down and let it simmer.

Stock should simmer for a long time. If you don't feel comfortable leaving a pot on your stove simmering for 12 hours, a crockpot is a wise investment. I put the stock into the crockpot and set it to high.

After your stock has been simmering for some time, skim off any "scum" on the surface, strain out the bones and vegetable remnants, and put it in your fridge, in a jar ideally. After it cools you should have excess fat floating on the top. Discard this or use it as an ingredient. I would taste it first, as some stock fat isn't so tasty.

Finished touch: Salt makes a big difference in terms of flavor. If you are using the stock soon, salt it to taste. If you want to freeze it for future use DON'T SALT- you should reduce it by boiling it down. Then you can put it in icecube trays and use it later.

So now you have some delicious stock!  Serve it as a broth soup or puree in your favorite roasted vegetables. I like to stick a pumpkin in my crockpot on low overnight until it's soft and just scoop out the flesh and mix with the broth and my favorite flavorings. I also use stock to make restaurant-quality brown sauces, gravies (sub out flour and use coconut flour which you can purchase at many health food stores like the Park Slope Co-op or online) and mashed root vegetables.

Chicken Hearts

Chicken hearts are cheap, healthy, and can be tasty, but when most people buy a whole chicken they throw the heart out along with the rest of the giblets. That's a shame because of the giblets, hearts are perhaps the easiest to make tasty. If you didn't grow up eating offal foods like liver, you might have a tough time with their earthy mineral flavor. I personally don't really like that flavor, but it can be muted with acidic and spicy ingredients. 

I was originally looking for calves heart, but not wanting to make a trip to every butcher in the city, I settled for the first heart I saw at Union Square, which was chicken hearts. They came attached to the livers, but they were easily detached. The sinews and clots might look gross, but they are easily removed. Just as much of that as you can to reveal the muscle. 

Chicken hearts can be found in Japanese cuisine. In class I mentioned the temple of chicken offal, Yakitori Totto, which is in Midtown. They serve organic chicken hearts on a skewer! Mmm! Great and open late. I heard that this is one of Anthony Bourdain's favorite late night eats. 

I marinated the chicken hearts using the method Fergus Henderson uses in The Whole Beast: Nose to Tail Eating for calves heart. The night before the class I sliced the hearts into bite sized pieces and put them in a jar with a "health splash of balsamic vinegar," some coarse sea salt, ground black pepper, and some hot pepper. They were simple to cook, I just grilled them in a bit of lard. A perfect appetizer for adventurous guests. 

Lard

I guess since I mentioned lard, I might as well recap our short talk about it. Our host Matt showed us his homemade lard. He got fatback from a local farmer and rendered it over low heat. The biggest mistake with rendering lard is boiling it, which can ruin it. I personally like to render lard from pork belly, since I LOVE pork belly anyway. I just put it in the crock pot on low overnight and the fat renders out. The pork belly is seasoned and crisped and the bonus is this wonderful cooking fat. Momofuku uses a similar method to obtain belly and cooking fat. 

We talked about how great lard is-high in saturated fat that holds up well to heat. Coconut oil is another good choice, which is easier to find. I also obtained some excellent lard from my membership in The Piggery CSA. 

BONE MARROW

Yum! Those bones might look boring, but that white stuff is delicious nutritious FAT. In fact, there is a theory that this fat is what fueled the large brain development in our early meat eating ape ancestors. Scavenged muscle meat is kind of gross, but if they cracked a bone, delicious and perfectly good fat would be the reward. 

Marrow bones were popular in Victorian times, often given as a healing food for invalids. Their popularity waned and you could get them free in many places, but in the past decade there has been increased interest in the gourmet world. That was spurred by chefs like Fergus Henderson, who wrote the aforementioned The Whole Beast: Nose to Tail Eating. His book celebrates quality local carefully raised meat by not wasting any of it. On this side of the pond, his disciple Anthony Bourdain has also done his part to glorify "the nasty bits." The foreward to the American version of this cookbook is written by him. 

I'm very grateful for these chefs, but also kind of annoyed at how expensive marrow bones have gotten. They are still very cheap, but you can't get them for free any more. They are easy to find at butchers like The Meat Hook, Dicksons Farmstand Meats, the farmer's market, and sometimes Whole Foods. If the store you shop in doesn't know what marrow bones are, you need to find a new place to shop because anyone versed in meat should at least know them. The bones used in class were bison bones from the Union Square Farmers Market. Henderson uses veal bones, which are great, but the bones of any large ruminant are all good. 

His most famous recipe is probably the parsley and bone marrow salad, which we made. This salad basically uses the delicious silky fat as a dressing. It uses flat leaf parley as a salad leaf, which is perfect because it is milder than its curly leaved cousin, but still wonderfully fresh and bright tasting. 

Marrow bones are SO easy to cook. In fact, I've even cooked them in a toaster oven. But Vlad pointed out that you don't even need to cook them. We passed around a bone and some brave people in our class ate the marrow raw and enjoyed it. I like the taste of cooked marrow though. I put the bones in at 425. The point is to melt the fat so it can go on the salad. 

In the meantime, I picked the leaves from the stems of a bunch of parsley (the stems went in the stock),  thinly sliced a shallot (Henderson calls for two, but I prefer just one), squeezed on some lemon juice, and added some capers. Henderson, like me, doesn't seem to care for fussy recipes. Basic ingredients are all you need and you can adjust things to taste. Henderson does warn you to be careful about not putting in too many capers....but don't forget them! I had never had capers until last year and despite their ugly measly appearance, they do add an important zing to many dishes. 

After the fat in the bones was melted (be sure to cook them on something that can collect this), I took them out and using a spoon and a knife, put the delicious globs of fat and the drippings from the pan on the parsley mixture. I added some salt and pepper to taste. People really seemed to enjoy this recipe! It combines fatty indulgence with vegetal freshness. 

You can learn more about the nutritional properties of marrow bones here

What is paleo?

This class was a good reminder that approaches to paleo can be diverse and it's important to think about your food. Sarah made a delicious split pea soup, but many questioned whether legumes were OK. Legumes can be very high in antinutrients(these can interfere with nutrient absorption and irritate your gut) and Loren Cordain warns against them. But most of us aren't 100% paleo. What is in your off percentage? Whole foods like peas are certainly much better than candy bars. I'm 100% real food and 100% into using evolution to guide my choices, but sometimes I crave some legumes. The best way to prepare them is by soaking and fermentation. Nourishing Traditions is the bible for that, providing instructions handed down through the ages that minimize harmful substances in legumes and maximize their nutrition (Sally Fallon, the author, will be speaking in NYC next week!). One thing I enjoy occasionally are dosas and idlis. Stephen from Whole Health Source has a great post about these. I make them over two days, one day to soak the legume, fenugreek seeds, and rice (you can use any variety, I have used split peas, red rice, black rice...), the next to ferment. My crockpot instructions warned me not to leave food in the pot on "warm" as that can encourage bacterial growth. YES! I love bacterial growth. In India, where dosas and idlis were invented, they don't need this as the climate is warm, but here you do. I grind the soaked mixture in a food professor with water to make a thin batter and put it in the crock pot on warm. If you are successful, you should get a sour smell some hours later. Sour = good. If it smells bad, just cut your losses and throw it away. Once it is sour enough, I either steam to make idlis or fry in coconut oil to make dosa pancakes. Paleo? No way, so I don't eat them that often. Real food? Yes. 

Potatoes also came up? Are potatoes paleo? Paleo blogger Don says yes, others say NO way. They do have lots of carbs and nightshades have some anti-nutrients that may be harmful (though scientific studies on this are sparse). I say that it's best to avoid tubers and nightshades at first. Carbs can feed bad bacteria, so if you have stomach problems, stick with low net carb until your stomach feels better. I added in potatoes and peppers about a year after going paleo and never had any ill effects. I am happy to enjoy spicy Thai food and mashed potatoes again, but I recognize that some people feel better without these foods and other people gain weight on them. 

If you have questions about paleo ingredients, I strongly suggest visiting Paleohacks.com.

03/21/2010 - 13:24

 I meet them all the time- people who tell me that they would never try the paleo diet because their diet makes them feel awesome. Maybe they don't realize that a face covered with acne and a spare tire around their waist aren't exactly markers of feeling awesome. 

I thought of that when reading this NYT article about Alicia Silverstone where she eats a meal presumably loaded with inflammatory omega-6 fatty acids

She settled on nachos and onion rings to start, and mulled beer selections with two girlfriends who had seen her show that night. This was no dive bar that the trio had chosen for a post-performance meal; it was Candle 79, a cozy Upper East Side restaurant that specializes in organic and vegan cuisine. The nachos came slathered in refried pinto beans, tofu sour cream and chili-grilled seitan, a wheat-based meat substitute.

If you are at a vegan restaurant, be sure to avoid fried things. Unless Candle 79 is bucking the trend, they are using canola, safflower, and soy oils, which are rich in omega-6, which to boot is also sensitive to eat. Alicia's fried food was probably loaded with rancid inflammatory fats. I was sad when I realized my favorite veggie-friendly restaurant, Souen, uses such oils to fry in. I LOVED their fried oysters, but I can't order them again. 

But she claims she feels awesome

The karma of turning vegan is amazing. And then to get this sudden weight loss, and my skin is glowing and my nails are strong and my eyes are white — it was wonderful.

But if you google Alicia Silverstone and acne, you can find pictures of her without makeup showing off her not-exactly glowing skin. It's not a surprise: gluten and rancid omega-6s are a nasty combination. It's not veganism that's the real problem here though, it's the idea that veganism is THE PERFECT diet and as long as you don't touch those nasty animal products you are AOK. The truth is that acne is usually caused by things like gluten, sugar, and omega-6 oils. It's hard to avoid these as a vegan...or anyone who eats one, but worth it for everyone!

Last year I had some issues with acne. I realized it was because of my "cheat meal" at the Swedish pub, which was a burger with mayo. The burger bun and the oil in the mayo=bad news for my skin. I have delicate skin and what I eat really does show up, for some lucky people it doesn't, but maybe they aren't so lucky because they don't get that visual indicator. Either way, so many women I know accept acne as normal! If you are 25 and still have acne, that's the sign of a problem. 

I was reading this excellent interview with an ex-vegan this morning and she also talks about her "veganism as perfect diet" blinders:

 

Did you feel better or worse as a vegan? 

I felt better for the first four months and then progressively worse for the next seven years.

But did you tell people you felt better?

While I was vegan I worked as a manager in a health food store.  I always told myself and others that I felt much better as a vegan (deep down I knew I didn’t).  I think I was actually trying to convince myself that I felt better.  “I’m thinner, so I MUST feel better.” 

If you do the paleo diet you have to be conscious of blinders too. If you are having a problem, admit it and look for solutions. It's very much possible to have a diet that causes problems, but is technically paleo. 

 

03/19/2010 - 17:58

From Dr. Harris at PaNu

Non- ruminants are much more subject to passing on the ratio they get in their diets. So the unhealthiest beef has a 6:3 ratio as good or better than pastured free range bug-eating chicken, and fowl fat from industrial operations is like eating vegetable oil.

That's something good to remember. I had a roommate who was a poultry scientist and I learned lots about chicken feed from him. It's nearly impossible to raise modern breeds of chicken...or any chicken for market weights without using lots and lots of grains, seeds, and legumes. Same goes for hogs. I've updated paleo foods in light of this. 

While feedlot beef might have gorged on grains at the end of their lives, they spent much of their lives relying on grass. If I am at a restaurant and the choice is between chicken of dubious origin and beef of dubious origin, I pick beef. Lamb is an even better choice.

When I'm dining with friends who could give a damn about local or paleo food, I try to steer them towards Middle Eastern or Indian restaurants that might use Halal meat. There isn't much terribly special about it, except they are likely to serve lamb and the is likely to be from New Zealand (major producer of halal meats) and thus grass fed. Don Wiss pointed this out at in the forums at Eating Paleo in NYC.

03/18/2010 - 16:05

 The sense of human alienation from nature, so prevalent in contemporary American culture, is in some ways the shadow-side of the Edenic wilderness myth. In light of the obvious damage we have done to the nonhuman environment, it is tempting to adopt a hands-off attitude and entertain the fantasy of nature's returning to a pristine state. The idea of "letting nature be nature" arises, however, from secondhand knowledge and nature-romanticism; it does no work in practice. Ultimately, we are all implicated, for better and for worse, in the fate of the natural world of which humanity is, in fact, very much a part. As native and traditional cultures help to show, hunter-awareness provides a crucial way of coming to terms with the extent to which each individual life is founded upon the deaths of vibrantly alive others. 

Consider the following excerpt from an obituary of a suicide, published not long ago in a radical environmental journal "Tony was a passionate man who felt the earth's distress acutely. In a letter he left to some of his friends he explained his reason for departing. He stated his life had never been better personally. He didn't want people to be sad for him. He checked out as a response to the overwhelming toll we humans are extracting from the planet. His strategy was to lighten the load....

It's hard to imagine more graphic, in some ways chilling, depictions of the alienation of humans from the rest of nature....some revolutionary activists see the eradication of humanity from the "earth-organism" as the only cure to the global environmental crisis....the popular fiction is of a "balance of nature" in which the non-human world, left to its own wisdom and devices, reverts to equilibrium and harmony. It is a fiction that more than once has masqueraded as science in the shaping of wildlife management. 

From Mary Zeiss Strange's Woman The Hunter, which does an awesome job of laying bare the true anti-humanistic nature of ecoveganism. Humans ARE nature and many animals we hunt have evolved with us as predators. It is very sad how some parts of the environmental movement see the need to denigrate us as a species and deny that we are worth much. 

Recently a vegan blog I read for the recipes did a post equating women's rights movement with the animal right's movement. It brought to mind this quote by Peter Staudenmaier:

The central analogy to the civil rights movement and the women’s movement is trivializing and ahistorical. Both of those social movements were initiated and driven by members of the dispossessed and excluded groups themselves, not by benevolent men or white people acting on their behalf. Both movements were built precisely around the idea of reclaiming and reasserting a shared humanity in the face of a society that had deprived it and denied it. No civil rights activist or feminist ever argued, “We’re sentient beings too!” They argued, “We’re fully human too!” Animal liberation doctrine, far from extending this humanist impulse, directly undermines it.

03/17/2010 - 19:49

 Guess I'm a little late to the party, but Mark's Daily Apple blogger Mark Sisson is on a push to get his book The Primal Blueprint to the top of Amazon's health & fitness list.  I definitely recommend buying the book now if you haven't. It's a great intro book and I bought one as a gift today. As a bonus Mark is offering some cool freebies. 

I also just finished Heart and Blood by Richard K. Nelson and will be writing a post on it as soon as I have time. 

I added it along with other excellent books to my reading list here

Also, you should check out Modern Paleo's new mailing lists. They look very promising!

Syndicate content