economics

07/26/2010 - 07:59

The Becker-Posner Blog asks whether unemployment compensation should be extended:

However, the actual large extension poses a major risk of creating an unemployment culture where men and women remain “ unemployed” for years. Once the period of unemployment becomes long enough, people begin to get the habits from being unemployed for a long time: they sleep late, develop various leisure interests, and at the same time their work skills depreciate from not using them for an extended period.

Ummm, when I read that I couldn't help but substitute:

However, the actual large extension poses a major risk of creating an college culture where men and women remain “in college” for years. Once the period of college becomes long enough, people begin to get the habits from being in college for a long time: they sleep late, develop various leisure interests, and at the same time their work skills depreciate from not using them for an extended period.

My parents would be delighted if I went to grad school, which is tempting, but I have many older friends who did long stints in grad school and come out with jobs paying the same as mine, bad work habits (which I also suffered from thanks to college), and mounds of debt. The only thing drawing me in is the actual desire to learn more about subjects I'm interested in, but I've seen too many people get burned by that. They get to study something they like, but under professors who aren't any good. What would make me go to grad school? The chance to study under a specific expert perhaps. That's how it was in the days of people like Plato. You didn't go to school just to go there (or in the case of some friends, to attempt to ride out the recession), but to follow a great scholar or two.

I'm feeling much better, but this weekend I was at DrupalCamp NYC, which is a conference for the web platform I develop on. It powers this site, though I definitely have neglected other features besides the blog. I presented a couple of sessions- user interface, LAMP/MAMP stack, and Drupal for small business/education/non-profits. But the food was a big challenge. I managed to get gluten-free options this time, but the option was gluten-free pasta with tomato sauce— not exactly a source of calories or nutrition in general, though definitely more nutritious than the conventional offerings of cheese pizza and bagels, though there was some fruit provided. Next year I'm going to push for either not doing food at all or doing food that isn't made of refined flour. The problem is that people want to spend as little as possible...when are people going to learn that cheap food mostly = bad food? Paleo, the idea that humans should eat human food, is very popular in the tech community, but this reminds me that it's still a small movement. I ate the gluten free pasta, bananas, and coffee... and ended the weekend bloated and fatigued.

What would a better option consist of? I think a salad bar with loads of greens, good calorie-rich dressings, nuts, fruits, and meats would be an awesome option that would please everyone from vegans to celiacs.

P.S. Another instance of government crushing the small farm movement- this time not raw milk, but a home-slaughtered pig. The government is scared because they are realizing that the jigs up- people are realizing that government inspected and approved does not equal safe and that individuals can often do a better job.

06/29/2010 - 22:34

Allan Savory - Keeping Cattle: cause or cure for climate crisis? from Feasta on Vimeo.

Livestock...ahem *certain* environmental pundits have painted them as greenhouse gas emitting monsters responsible for the destruction of the Amazon (I reply...my beef didn't come from Brazil, did your soy beans?). The winner of the Buckminister Fuller Challenge discusses a more holistic approach to livestock.

04/28/2010 - 10:02

Surprisingly enough, there are many vegan and vegetarian restaurants I enjoy. When I am out with vegetarian friends, I don't mind getting a bowl of various vegetables and some of these restaurants are actually fairly good. Overall, when confronted with a choice between meat from a questionable source and a vegan entree, I'll often chose the latter.

But one restaurant I will not be eating at is Otarian. Besides insulting resource economists everywhere by using questionable calculations to make their food look "low carbon," it appears the owners are a bunch of dietary fascists:

 Indian Australian billionaires Pankaj and Radhika Oswal have banned workers building their Peppermint Grove mansion from eating meat, attracting the ire of the Western Australian construction union.

The building workers have been told that they cannot eat ham sandwiches or meat pies at the building site of the 70 million dollar mega-mansion.

Workers at the site said yesterday there was one small shed at the bottom of the site which they were allowed to eat meat in.

A source close to the Oswals, who did not want to be named, said some workers had continued to eat meat on the site "just to spite them".

Oswal, who is in New York this week helping his wife prepare for the launch of her vegetarian fast-food chain, Otarian, defended the meat ban, saying "This is our home".

Radhika Oswal has previously accused the meat industry of "raping the earth".

"Meat eating is creating bad karma and you are also creating a vicious cycle. It's destroying us environmentally, economically and socially. I'm putting my money where my mouth is. I've always been a vegetarian so I have always felt strongly about it," she said.

The house, expected to be finished at the end of 2011, will have a gymnasium the size of a regular Perth house, a beauty salon, an observatory, parking for 17 cars and a swimming pool 10 times bigger than the average backyard

Hmm...in the words of Midtown Lunch " I wonder how many Tex Mex Burgers you’d need to eat to off set their 17 car garage?" Meanwhile, vegans are rightfully angry that the restaurant serves dairy. I'm sorry to break it to the owners, but Bessie the cow doesn't go to Florida for retirement when her milk production slows.

That's the difference between the paleo diet and ideological diets. The paleo diet is about you feeling your best. While many people who eat this way enjoy telling others about the benefits, we have no reason to try to force it on others through coercive language or policy.

I'll admit their "Sweet potato chiplets" looked kind of good...until I read the ingredients "Sweet Potatoes, Breadcrumbs, Corn Starch, Lemon Juice, Vegetable Oil, Wheat Flour, Garlic, Salt, Water." Yeah, there is nothing more sustainable than corn starch grown 500 miles away. I wonder where the dairy in the salads is from? They say they are working with a top supplier, but that's all the information they'll provide. They also say they are working to not have the cows slaughtered after their production ends, but that's not exactly compatible with environmental friendliness as that means the cows will be eating and producing methane for many more years. That's a laughably low feed conversion ratio.

Meanwhile, there are plenty of restaurants that offer food that supports our local community both animal and vegetable. The great thing about local food is that you are intimately connected with the effects of your purchase. When people tell me about the rainforest being cut down to feed beef I tell them I'm glad I don't eat beef that's a. lived in Brazil b. eaten anything grown in Brazil.

Probably the most efficient system would be a mixed local one based on growing things appropriate for each ecosystem. Framing the argument as vegetarian or bust obscures the complexity of environmental economics and ignores the fact that meat is an inevitable by product of dairy and egg production and that sustainable agriculture involves animal-based fertilizer. I know an egg farmer is a good one if he or she is selling spent hens and rooster meat. Not only is a young rooster flavorful and cheap, but it means that they didn't just waste the male chicks that were born. I also highly respect goat dairies that sell wonderful goat meat. MMM- there is nothing like a nice goat curry.

04/16/2010 - 10:36

Have you read Let Them Eat Meat? It's a rather audacious blog written by ex-vegan Rhys Southan who now eats paleo. He skewers vegan pseudo-science, obsession, and guilt-mongering. He also posts some awesome interviews both with happy vegans/vegetarians and those who have found that the vegan diet didn't work for them. It's fascinating food for thought- philosophically and as an anthropological study of what people eat and why. Today he interviews yours truly. Take a look!

 

03/16/2010 - 10:40

No matter what your political opinion is of food stamps, if you stand on the side of real food, this article about buying "gourmet" food on food stamps and the comments are a bit incendiary.

Apparently people are having the audacity to buy food that tastes good and is appropriate for humans, like wild fish and rabbit. Egads, don't they know poor people should be eating beans? 

At nearly every food justice conference I go to I hear that. I'll go from one seminar on raising heritage poultry for fancy restaurants to another seminar on how we can save all the poor people from obesity by teaching them to cook dried beans bought in bulk. At the same conference where we talk in the livestock feed seminar about feeding cattle diets appropriate for their species, no one every questions whether beans are good food for humans. And while we talk about heirloom lettuce and fatty Ossabow pigs, we forget to acknowledge that desire for good tasting things is universal among humans.

Either way, the reason that wild fish and decent meat are out of reach from poor people is due to artificial distortions in our economy and how we live.

This weekend I went to Jackson Lander's locavore hunting seminar. He puts delicious nutritious wild meat on his family's table for just the cost of a gun and ammo. Just like my dirt poor ancestors did in Arkansas and Lousiana. They ate rabbit, turtle, venison, crawfish... the kind of food you get at gourmet restaurants these days. Back then poor people weren't obese and my ancestors lived into their 80s despite the tough conditions they endured.

I can tell you that campaigns to get beloved "veggies" and vegetable gardens into low income schools have their merits, but they will probably do little to alter the overall dietary makeup. Lettuce has vitamins and minerals, but little in the way of calories. Beans? With bacon they are pretty good, but most do gooders are advocating a vegetarian diet that would probably send most people with tastebuds back to KFC.

Teaching low income people to butchers, hunt (deer in particular are overpopulated in most areas), fish, and raise animals for food would go a long way in altering their diets as while as providing them valuable and in-demand skills for jobs.

But we already knew that...."teach a man to fish..."

01/14/2010 - 14:02

It's been a long time since I read this book as a an economics/anthropology student, but it had a big impact on me. The essays are diverse and provide plenty of food for thought. The essays also shred pop-culture stone age myths about everything from longevity to the status of women. You can read one of the essays for free online- the seminal The Original Affluent Society by Marshall Sahlins.

01/12/2010 - 14:01

IMG 2845

I sent the New York Times article to my grandma, who is now over 90 and doesn't have any health problems. She sent me an email saying how great it was that I was featured, but expressed concern that the diet itself is too extreme to follow for long. My grandmother is so healthy and sometimes I wonder why not just eat like she does, a no-nonsense Michael Pollan-style "eat food, not too much, mostly plants" diet. I suppose that with my involvement in sustainable agriculture, this would be my diet.

When I was at Stone Barns for the Young Farmer's Conference, that was the food that was served. Briefly, I thought that because it was so wholesome and from such a good place, I could indulge in the buttery scones, tangy bean chili, and whole grain bread with butter. This was the sort of food that has sustained my grandmother so well into her 90s, but by the second day I was doubled over in pain.

Whether it's because of genes or my upbringing... I don't know, but I and other younger members of my family struggle from health problems my grandmother is baffled by. That's how I discovered the paleo diet.

And in many ways I don't like the word "paleo" or "caveman" to describe the diet. In so many ways my own diet is not paleo, it's merely an evolutionary-aware diet that provided a framework to discover what foods cause problems for me. I could just have called it an elimination diet, but that would have eliminated all I've learned about evolution, other cultures, and food science. I never in a million gazillion years would have signed up for anthropology classes otherwise. I was an agricultural economics major and until I discovered the paleo diet, I thought I had no use for that.

It's interesting that so many of the biggest proponents of the paleo diet from Art De Vany to Nassim Taleb are economists. I think that is because this framework for thinking is actually fairly efficient. It's asking why certain aspects of modern life are crappy. The paleo framework, instead of waiting for scientists to develop pills for the problems, realizes that our ancestors didn't have such problems and tries to imitate what behaviors prevented them.

The reason I hated my food science classes was that the philosophy so reductionist....I remember my intro to food science professor telling the class that vitamins are just vitamins and it doesn't matter if you get them from fruit or from pills. More recent science is showing this isn't true, but the overarching point was that they snarked anytime you suggested their view was wrong, because hey, if there is no evidence that vitamins from pills aren't as good, then they must be just as good. They didn't even think to test traditional wisdom to prove or disprove its worth. That's why I like Loren Cordain so much, because that's exactly what he does and it makes so much more sense to study cultures where a disorder isn't present to figure out what they are doing wrong rather than tinker for untold hours in a lab.

Some paleo dieters fall into the trap of naturalistic fallacy, but the average paleo dieter is a technologically-savvy eccentric quants wanting quite simply to optimize their life the way they optimize their equations and code. We are constantly questioning foods, paleo or not, and asking if they make our lives better or worse.

Besides that, the paleo diet "lifestyle" framework is tons more fun and enriching to your whole life than just being, for example, dairy-free.

Syndicate content