Inuit only ate meat right? Wrong, the Inuit have an extensive variety of plant foods as well, documented in this wonderful ethnography...
Raw Meat?
Raw flesh might sound scary, but every traditional healthy culture studied by Weston A. Price ate at least some raw animal products. I was reminded of that when I dug up this article from the Washington Post about raw meat eating in Siberia. Raw meat also has a following in NYC too and I know several people who subsist on over 50% raw. I started doing raw foods as a vegan, but I gradually moved over to raw meat when I found that raw veganism made me feel malnourished and fatigued. That was a time in my life when I had been a little wild and I had probably done some damage to my stomach. I found raw meat, eggs, and fish was about the only thing that I could eat that didn't make me feel like crap. I never fell ill during this time.
Why don't I eat raw anymore? Well, I certainly eat plenty of raw foods still, primarily oysters, fish, and some grass fed meat. But raw is expensive because you really have to be careful about sourcing and you absorb fewer calories per gram of meat according to Richard Wrangham's book Catching Fire. I'm also a foodie at heart and once my stomach was healed, it was hard for me to find a reason not to eat delicious cooked food. But the raw paleos have some good arguments for their way of eating and it is definitely beneficial to eat some raw food even if it's just an oyster or two.
There has also been lots of buzz about carnivore-only diets in the paleo community lately. Such diets are traditional and there are numerous instances of healthy peoples like the Inuit who ate that way. Arctic explorer Vilhjalmur Stefansson was perhaps one of the first urban NYC cavemen when he frequented Greenwich Village Salons back in the 1930s. Studying the Inuit, he was amazed to find that there were healthy despite eating a diet of almost 100% flesh. Back in the States, he did a study where he and another explorer agreed to eat only meat for a year to prove anyone could be healthy on such a diet. The diet was a success and he remains an idol to the carnivore community. I suggest everyone check out his excellent books.
I think though that while such diets can be successful, they are not paleo (there is no evidence of completely carnivorous pre-neolithic cultures) and not necessarily appropriate for everyone. In the long term, Inuit suffer from osteoporosis, probably because of excessive amounts of protein. There are some genetic differences that appear to allow them to eat their diet more successfully. Carnivore is just one option to investigate if other diets don't work, but it can be a difficult road and perhaps it's not so optimal for the long term.
Either way, there is much we can learn from cultures like the Inuit. Here are several rules I have gleaned
- Eat both marine and land animals
- Eat LOTS of fat and enjoy it!
- Eat at least some of your meat and fish raw
- Eat nose to tail...marrow, brains, eyeballs, and all the nasty bits
- Melissa's blog
- Login to post comments
Post to Twitter

Comments
Coincidently I'm finding Raw
Coincidently I'm finding Raw animal products (eggs, liver beef) digest extremely easily myself - and having a problem with IBS this is most certainly a good thing. And undoubtedly, the point you raised about the cost factor is definitely an issue.
Can I ask though, where would one find more info on eating raw stuff. Fish in particular I guess - the parasite issue with marine life has put me off going down that avenue untill I'm a bit more informed.
And finally ( ;) ) Is the highly useful GERD stuff you've writen about relevant to other digestive complaints like IBS.
Cheersm and keep up the good writes with this blog :)
One of my favorites is sushi.
One of my favorites is sushi. I also like Steak tartare, but I haven't yet tried any other raw meat.
Watch it there. Think again.
Watch it there. Think again. Think about what Paleo people had available to them in wintertime. Do you think they had tons of plant food around? Nah. They might have had some stores of roots or nuts but those would not have lasted all winter in northern latitudes. And with it that cold, they wouldn't have been running around overmuch to gather stuff. They probably just went out to hunt, for the most part.
If anybody has got a long winter to contend with, it is the Inuit. And the idea that protein leeches calcium out of bones has pretty well been discredited, except among ideological vegetarians maybe.
http://www.westonaprice.org/Dem-Bones-Do-High-Protein-Diets-Cause-Bone-L...
I've seen Atkins say the same thing--that there may be initial calcium loss when one initially increases the meat in one's diet, but it is only temporary. Sounds like the body's achieving homeostasis, not eating its own bones.
It's worth remembering that the Inuit traditionally ate a lot of sea foods and therefore would have had access to large amounts of vitamin D even in winter. That is an important vitamin for bone preservation.
It's also worth remembering that very few indigenous people are allowed to follow strictly traditional lifestyles anymore. I don't think there are any First Nations people in Canada these days who are left alone by either government or commerce. Stands to reason they eat our food; also stands to reason it's hurting them.
Awesome blog. I'm happy to see more and more like this.
"Eat nose to tail...marrow,
"Eat nose to tail...marrow, brains, eyeballs, and all the nasty bits"
LOL! Sorry, I don't think I could do that, especially raw. You can have my share.
The 50 Best Health Blogs